Our Forums
-
Posts
-
Felt the post was written for someone like me without explicitly addressing me, and a look at echostall produced the same fit, when content lands on its target without pandering you know the writer has done careful audience thinking rather than relying on demographic targeting or interest signals to do the work of editorial decisions.
If you scroll past this site without looking carefully you will miss something, and a stop at mossmarketplace extended that mild warning, the surface of the site does not advertise its quality loudly which means careful attention is required to recognise what is being offered here which is itself a kind of editorial signal.
Comfortable in tone and substantive in content, that is a hard combination to land, and a look at grivor kept that pairing alive across more material, this is what good editorial direction looks like in practice and the team here clearly has someone keeping a steady hand on the wheel across what they decide to publish.
Glad to have another reliable bookmark for this topic, and a look at praxiva suggested several more pages I will be marking too, building a personal library of trustworthy resources is one of the actual rewards of careful browsing and this site is earning a place on my permanent shortlist for the topic.
A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at shieldedshelf maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
